Comments on: Jesus’ alternative path http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=833 Baby, you're the ginchiest. Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:08:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: dwasifar http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=833&cpage=1#comment-5664 dwasifar Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:18:45 +0000 http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=833#comment-5664 @Fnortner: LOL! Oxford/Harvard/serial: I'll stick with "serial comma." Don't want to play favorites.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('5664','dwasifar'); return false;">Reply</a> | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('5664','dwasifar','@Fnortner: LOL!\r\n\r\nOxford\/Harvard\/serial: I\'ll stick with \"serial comma.\" Don\'t want to play favorites.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> @Fnortner: LOL!

Oxford/Harvard/serial: I’ll stick with “serial comma.” Don’t want to play favorites.

Reply | Quote
]]> By: Mr Fnortner http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=833&cpage=1#comment-5662 Mr Fnortner Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:38:05 +0000 http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=833#comment-5662 Given the number of christian ministers publicly culpable of homosexual affairs, and the incredible number of closeted christian married men, I would say that the missing (I prefer Oxford) comma is the tidiest Freudian slip I have seen in quite a while.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('5662','Mr Fnortner'); return false;">Reply</a> | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('5662','Mr Fnortner','Given the number of christian ministers publicly culpable of homosexual affairs, and the incredible number of closeted christian married men, I would say that the missing (I prefer Oxford) comma is the tidiest Freudian slip I have seen in quite a while.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Given the number of christian ministers publicly culpable of homosexual affairs, and the incredible number of closeted christian married men, I would say that the missing (I prefer Oxford) comma is the tidiest Freudian slip I have seen in quite a while.
Reply | Quote
]]> By: Grinebiter http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=833&cpage=1#comment-5651 Grinebiter Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:21:13 +0000 http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=833#comment-5651 The funny wrong meaning would be stronger if you had "Jesus comma and". But yes, the Harvard comma is designed to avoid precisely this kind of ambiguity. I'll forward this to Quinion's World Wide Words, I think.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('5651','Grinebiter'); return false;">Reply</a> | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('5651','Grinebiter','The funny wrong meaning would be stronger if you had \"Jesus comma and\". But yes, the Harvard comma is designed to avoid precisely this kind of ambiguity. I\'ll forward this to Quinion\'s World Wide Words, I think.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> The funny wrong meaning would be stronger if you had “Jesus comma and”. But yes, the Harvard comma is designed to avoid precisely this kind of ambiguity. I’ll forward this to Quinion’s World Wide Words, I think.
Reply | Quote
]]> By: CrankyAshley http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=833&cpage=1#comment-5649 CrankyAshley Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:58:39 +0000 http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=833#comment-5649 Agreed on both accounts<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('5649','CrankyAshley'); return false;">Reply</a> | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('5649','CrankyAshley','Agreed on both accounts'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Agreed on both accounts
Reply | Quote
]]>