<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for dwasifar&#039;s daily gripe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dwasifar.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dwasifar.com</link>
	<description>Baby, you&#039;re the ginchiest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:35:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on These are bad signs by Mr Fnortner</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220&#038;cpage=1#comment-8165</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Fnortner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220#comment-8165</guid>
		<description>Dwasifar, you are being conspicuously silent during this time of rabid Muslim hating. Me, I&#039;m for the mosque in Manhattan and the preacher who wants to burn Korans, both. The first, for the reason that religious freedom (until religion becomes is illegal) is a pillar of American principles. The second, because freedom of expression has more meaning to me that freedom from government intervention in religion. Plus, I love sticking it to the state, which this pastor is doing.

Are you preparing a posting for us?&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8165&#039;,&#039;Mr Fnortner&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8165&#039;,&#039;Mr Fnortner&#039;,&#039;Dwasifar, you are being conspicuously silent during this time of rabid Muslim hating. Me, I\&#039;m for the mosque in Manhattan and the preacher who wants to burn Korans, both. The first, for the reason that religious freedom (until religion becomes is illegal) is a pillar of American principles. The second, because freedom of expression has more meaning to me that freedom from government intervention in religion. Plus, I love sticking it to the state, which this pastor is doing.\r\n\r\nAre you preparing a posting for us?&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dwasifar, you are being conspicuously silent during this time of rabid Muslim hating. Me, I&#8217;m for the mosque in Manhattan and the preacher who wants to burn Korans, both. The first, for the reason that religious freedom (until religion becomes is illegal) is a pillar of American principles. The second, because freedom of expression has more meaning to me that freedom from government intervention in religion. Plus, I love sticking it to the state, which this pastor is doing.</p>
<p>Are you preparing a posting for us?
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8165','Mr Fnortner'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8165','Mr Fnortner','Dwasifar, you are being conspicuously silent during this time of rabid Muslim hating. Me, I\'m for the mosque in Manhattan and the preacher who wants to burn Korans, both. The first, for the reason that religious freedom (until religion becomes is illegal) is a pillar of American principles. The second, because freedom of expression has more meaning to me that freedom from government intervention in religion. Plus, I love sticking it to the state, which this pastor is doing.\r\n\r\nAre you preparing a posting for us?'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu: Install Amarok 1.4 in 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) by roB3rnd</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1111&#038;cpage=1#comment-8150</link>
		<dc:creator>roB3rnd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1111#comment-8150</guid>
		<description>thank you very much sir.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8150&#039;,&#039;roB3rnd&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8150&#039;,&#039;roB3rnd&#039;,&#039;thank you very much sir.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you very much sir.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8150','roB3rnd'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8150','roB3rnd','thank you very much sir.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu: Install Amarok 1.4 in 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) by necrosmash</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1111&#038;cpage=1#comment-8137</link>
		<dc:creator>necrosmash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 12:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1111#comment-8137</guid>
		<description>This wa seriously helpful, thanks very much.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8137&#039;,&#039;necrosmash&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8137&#039;,&#039;necrosmash&#039;,&#039;This wa seriously helpful, thanks very much.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This wa seriously helpful, thanks very much.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8137','necrosmash'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8137','necrosmash','This wa seriously helpful, thanks very much.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on These are bad signs by Hugo Grinebiter</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220&#038;cpage=1#comment-8118</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Grinebiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220#comment-8118</guid>
		<description>&quot;the basic idea seems more in line with justice and fairness than the christian idea of sin against your neighbor and apologize to god for it.&quot;

What &quot;The Peace&quot;, as part of the eucharist, originally meant was that you had to settle up with your neighbour before you could proceed to communion. It disappeared from the order of service somewhere around late antiquity, I think, and then was revived by the charismatics as an excuse to cop a hug from the hotties. But I only know of one group to take it seriously: the Hutterites. Their eucharist is not a weekly ritual, but a feast held only after the successful resolution of ALL conflicts in the community. The process takes however long it takes, so if they get to hold it only twice a decade they&#039;re cool with this. Since they are close cousins, the Amish might do this too, but I have no information on this.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8118&#039;,&#039;Hugo Grinebiter&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8118&#039;,&#039;Hugo Grinebiter&#039;,&#039;\&quot;the basic idea seems more in line with justice and fairness than the christian idea of sin against your neighbor and apologize to god for it.\&quot;\r\n\r\nWhat \&quot;The Peace\&quot;, as part of the eucharist, originally meant was that you had to settle up with your neighbour before you could proceed to communion. It disappeared from the order of service somewhere around late antiquity, I think, and then was revived by the charismatics as an excuse to cop a hug from the hotties. But I only know of one group to take it seriously: the Hutterites. Their eucharist is not a weekly ritual, but a feast held only after the successful resolution of ALL conflicts in the community. The process takes however long it takes, so if they get to hold it only twice a decade they\&#039;re cool with this. Since they are close cousins, the Amish might do this too, but I have no information on this.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the basic idea seems more in line with justice and fairness than the christian idea of sin against your neighbor and apologize to god for it.&#8221;</p>
<p>What &#8220;The Peace&#8221;, as part of the eucharist, originally meant was that you had to settle up with your neighbour before you could proceed to communion. It disappeared from the order of service somewhere around late antiquity, I think, and then was revived by the charismatics as an excuse to cop a hug from the hotties. But I only know of one group to take it seriously: the Hutterites. Their eucharist is not a weekly ritual, but a feast held only after the successful resolution of ALL conflicts in the community. The process takes however long it takes, so if they get to hold it only twice a decade they&#8217;re cool with this. Since they are close cousins, the Amish might do this too, but I have no information on this.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8118','Hugo Grinebiter'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8118','Hugo Grinebiter','\&quot;the basic idea seems more in line with justice and fairness than the christian idea of sin against your neighbor and apologize to god for it.\&quot;\r\n\r\nWhat \&quot;The Peace\&quot;, as part of the eucharist, originally meant was that you had to settle up with your neighbour before you could proceed to communion. It disappeared from the order of service somewhere around late antiquity, I think, and then was revived by the charismatics as an excuse to cop a hug from the hotties. But I only know of one group to take it seriously: the Hutterites. Their eucharist is not a weekly ritual, but a feast held only after the successful resolution of ALL conflicts in the community. The process takes however long it takes, so if they get to hold it only twice a decade they\'re cool with this. Since they are close cousins, the Amish might do this too, but I have no information on this.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on These are bad signs by dwasifar</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220&#038;cpage=1#comment-8077</link>
		<dc:creator>dwasifar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220#comment-8077</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-8071&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Originally Posted By Hugo Grinebiter&lt;/a&gt; I was once told that Jews do it differently, you choose whether to forgive someone or not, and if you don&#039;t do it, god won&#039;t step in and tell the perp that he&#039;s forgiven him on your behalf, without consultation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is true.  I was married to a Jewish woman for eleven years, and I learned a few things about Yom Kippur.  Basically the idea is that if you sin against god, you ask forgiveness from god, but if you sin against your neighbor, you ask forgiveness from your neighbor, and if that forgiveness is not forthcoming, there&#039;s a black mark against you for the coming year that might catch the eye of the angel of death.  Rather macabre, that last part, but the basic idea seems more in line with justice and fairness than the christian idea of sin against your neighbor and apologize to god for it.

The comedian Emo Philips said it well:  &quot;When I was a little boy, I prayed every night for god to give me a bicycle.  Then I realized that god doesn&#039;t work that way.  So I stole one and asked him to forgive me.&quot;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-8068&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Originally Posted By Mr Fnortner&lt;/a&gt; I wonder about the cause and effect relationship between general intelligence and belief in the supernatural.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t.  ;)  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=526&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The last time I brought it up&lt;/a&gt;, though, it generated a lot of criticism from Urban.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8077&#039;,&#039;dwasifar&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8077&#039;,&#039;dwasifar&#039;,&#039;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=\&#039;#comment-8071\&#039; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Originally Posted By Hugo Grinebiter&lt;\/a&gt; I was once told that Jews do it differently, you choose whether to forgive someone or not, and if you don\&#039;t do it, god won\&#039;t step in and tell the perp that he\&#039;s forgiven him on your behalf, without consultation.&lt;\/blockquote&gt;\r\n\r\nThis is true.  I was married to a Jewish woman for eleven years, and I learned a few things about Yom Kippur.  Basically the idea is that if you sin against god, you ask forgiveness from god, but if you sin against your neighbor, you ask forgiveness from your neighbor, and if that forgiveness is not forthcoming, there\&#039;s a black mark against you for the coming year that might catch the eye of the angel of death.  Rather macabre, that last part, but the basic idea seems more in line with justice and fairness than the christian idea of sin against your neighbor and apologize to god for it.\r\n\r\nThe comedian Emo Philips said it well:  \&quot;When I was a little boy, I prayed every night for god to give me a bicycle.  Then I realized that god doesn\&#039;t work that way.  So I stole one and asked him to forgive me.\&quot;\r\n\r\n&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=\&#039;#comment-8068\&#039; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Originally Posted By Mr Fnortner&lt;\/a&gt; I wonder about the cause and effect relationship between general intelligence and belief in the supernatural.&lt;\/blockquote&gt;\r\n\r\nI don\&#039;t.  ;)  &lt;a href=\&quot;http:\/\/www.dwasifar.com\/?p=526\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;The last time I brought it up&lt;\/a&gt;, though, it generated a lot of criticism from Urban.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href='#comment-8071' rel="nofollow">Originally Posted By Hugo Grinebiter</a> I was once told that Jews do it differently, you choose whether to forgive someone or not, and if you don&#8217;t do it, god won&#8217;t step in and tell the perp that he&#8217;s forgiven him on your behalf, without consultation.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is true.  I was married to a Jewish woman for eleven years, and I learned a few things about Yom Kippur.  Basically the idea is that if you sin against god, you ask forgiveness from god, but if you sin against your neighbor, you ask forgiveness from your neighbor, and if that forgiveness is not forthcoming, there&#8217;s a black mark against you for the coming year that might catch the eye of the angel of death.  Rather macabre, that last part, but the basic idea seems more in line with justice and fairness than the christian idea of sin against your neighbor and apologize to god for it.</p>
<p>The comedian Emo Philips said it well:  &#8220;When I was a little boy, I prayed every night for god to give me a bicycle.  Then I realized that god doesn&#8217;t work that way.  So I stole one and asked him to forgive me.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><a href='#comment-8068' rel="nofollow">Originally Posted By Mr Fnortner</a> I wonder about the cause and effect relationship between general intelligence and belief in the supernatural.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t.  <img src='http://www.dwasifar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   <a href="http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=526" rel="nofollow">The last time I brought it up</a>, though, it generated a lot of criticism from Urban.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8077','dwasifar'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8077','dwasifar','&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=\'#comment-8071\' rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Originally Posted By Hugo Grinebiter&lt;\/a&gt; I was once told that Jews do it differently, you choose whether to forgive someone or not, and if you don\'t do it, god won\'t step in and tell the perp that he\'s forgiven him on your behalf, without consultation.&lt;\/blockquote&gt;\r\n\r\nThis is true.  I was married to a Jewish woman for eleven years, and I learned a few things about Yom Kippur.  Basically the idea is that if you sin against god, you ask forgiveness from god, but if you sin against your neighbor, you ask forgiveness from your neighbor, and if that forgiveness is not forthcoming, there\'s a black mark against you for the coming year that might catch the eye of the angel of death.  Rather macabre, that last part, but the basic idea seems more in line with justice and fairness than the christian idea of sin against your neighbor and apologize to god for it.\r\n\r\nThe comedian Emo Philips said it well:  \&quot;When I was a little boy, I prayed every night for god to give me a bicycle.  Then I realized that god doesn\'t work that way.  So I stole one and asked him to forgive me.\&quot;\r\n\r\n&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=\'#comment-8068\' rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;Originally Posted By Mr Fnortner&lt;\/a&gt; I wonder about the cause and effect relationship between general intelligence and belief in the supernatural.&lt;\/blockquote&gt;\r\n\r\nI don\'t.  ;)  &lt;a href=\&quot;http:\/\/www.dwasifar.com\/?p=526\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;The last time I brought it up&lt;\/a&gt;, though, it generated a lot of criticism from Urban.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu: Install Amarok 1.4 in 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) by RIP</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1111&#038;cpage=1#comment-8074</link>
		<dc:creator>RIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1111#comment-8074</guid>
		<description>Hi.
Someone know if IPOD Shuffel 4G works in Amarok14&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8074&#039;,&#039;RIP&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8074&#039;,&#039;RIP&#039;,&#039;Hi.\r\nSomeone know if IPOD Shuffel 4G works in Amarok14&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.<br />
Someone know if IPOD Shuffel 4G works in Amarok14
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8074','RIP'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8074','RIP','Hi.\r\nSomeone know if IPOD Shuffel 4G works in Amarok14'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on These are bad signs by Hugo Grinebiter</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220&#038;cpage=1#comment-8071</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Grinebiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220#comment-8071</guid>
		<description>Going back to forgiveness for a moment, it&#039;s actually worse than that. Christians insist that we must forgive those who have wronged us, on pain of going to hell, regardless -- this is the good bit -- regardless of whether they have repented, apologised or whatever you care to call it. Now, god is far more picky. God only forgives you if you repent and tell him you did wrong. Ergo, christians are being held to a higher standard of forgiveness than their deity. He gets to hold out for a nice apology, we don&#039;t. One effect of this is a charter for christians to wrong other christians, because their victims are then in a bind -- forgive or burn -- and this may even be the object of the whole exercise. 

So, the first church sign is downright wrong: most of us have forgiven people more than god forgives us, if we have forgiven them without their groveling to us. 

I was once told that Jews do it differently, you choose whether to forgive someone or not, and if you don&#039;t do it, god won&#039;t step in and tell the perp that he&#039;s forgiven him on your behalf, without consultation; nor will he give you a hard time for withholding forgiveness. Your choice. The Muslim line on forgiveness between humans I don&#039;t know, but I do know it is a religious duty not to let oneself be kicked around, which I consider a neat idea, much better than turning the other cheek.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8071&#039;,&#039;Hugo Grinebiter&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8071&#039;,&#039;Hugo Grinebiter&#039;,&#039;Going back to forgiveness for a moment, it\&#039;s actually worse than that. Christians insist that we must forgive those who have wronged us, on pain of going to hell, regardless -- this is the good bit -- regardless of whether they have repented, apologised or whatever you care to call it. Now, god is far more picky. God only forgives you if you repent and tell him you did wrong. Ergo, christians are being held to a higher standard of forgiveness than their deity. He gets to hold out for a nice apology, we don\&#039;t. One effect of this is a charter for christians to wrong other christians, because their victims are then in a bind -- forgive or burn -- and this may even be the object of the whole exercise. \r\n\r\nSo, the first church sign is downright wrong: most of us have forgiven people more than god forgives us, if we have forgiven them without their groveling to us. \r\n\r\nI was once told that Jews do it differently, you choose whether to forgive someone or not, and if you don\&#039;t do it, god won\&#039;t step in and tell the perp that he\&#039;s forgiven him on your behalf, without consultation; nor will he give you a hard time for withholding forgiveness. Your choice. The Muslim line on forgiveness between humans I don\&#039;t know, but I do know it is a religious duty not to let oneself be kicked around, which I consider a neat idea, much better than turning the other cheek.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going back to forgiveness for a moment, it&#8217;s actually worse than that. Christians insist that we must forgive those who have wronged us, on pain of going to hell, regardless &#8212; this is the good bit &#8212; regardless of whether they have repented, apologised or whatever you care to call it. Now, god is far more picky. God only forgives you if you repent and tell him you did wrong. Ergo, christians are being held to a higher standard of forgiveness than their deity. He gets to hold out for a nice apology, we don&#8217;t. One effect of this is a charter for christians to wrong other christians, because their victims are then in a bind &#8212; forgive or burn &#8212; and this may even be the object of the whole exercise. </p>
<p>So, the first church sign is downright wrong: most of us have forgiven people more than god forgives us, if we have forgiven them without their groveling to us. </p>
<p>I was once told that Jews do it differently, you choose whether to forgive someone or not, and if you don&#8217;t do it, god won&#8217;t step in and tell the perp that he&#8217;s forgiven him on your behalf, without consultation; nor will he give you a hard time for withholding forgiveness. Your choice. The Muslim line on forgiveness between humans I don&#8217;t know, but I do know it is a religious duty not to let oneself be kicked around, which I consider a neat idea, much better than turning the other cheek.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8071','Hugo Grinebiter'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8071','Hugo Grinebiter','Going back to forgiveness for a moment, it\'s actually worse than that. Christians insist that we must forgive those who have wronged us, on pain of going to hell, regardless -- this is the good bit -- regardless of whether they have repented, apologised or whatever you care to call it. Now, god is far more picky. God only forgives you if you repent and tell him you did wrong. Ergo, christians are being held to a higher standard of forgiveness than their deity. He gets to hold out for a nice apology, we don\'t. One effect of this is a charter for christians to wrong other christians, because their victims are then in a bind -- forgive or burn -- and this may even be the object of the whole exercise. \r\n\r\nSo, the first church sign is downright wrong: most of us have forgiven people more than god forgives us, if we have forgiven them without their groveling to us. \r\n\r\nI was once told that Jews do it differently, you choose whether to forgive someone or not, and if you don\'t do it, god won\'t step in and tell the perp that he\'s forgiven him on your behalf, without consultation; nor will he give you a hard time for withholding forgiveness. Your choice. The Muslim line on forgiveness between humans I don\'t know, but I do know it is a religious duty not to let oneself be kicked around, which I consider a neat idea, much better than turning the other cheek.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on These are bad signs by Mr Fnortner</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220&#038;cpage=1#comment-8068</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Fnortner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220#comment-8068</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t match Urban&#039;s articulate statement with anything reasonably profound, so I want to submit the winner of the lifetime achievement award for inanity. This was on a T-shirt I saw on a fat lady at a restaurant today (part of the after-church crowd filling the restaurant): &lt;em&gt;If His grace is an ocean we are all sinking. &lt;/em&gt;I was stunned by the phenomenally absurd metaphor, then I spent a wasted five minutes trying to imagine what the author really meant, then I gave up in exasperation. In my mind, if I were to be creative with the concept of grace, I would think that grace should support a body rather than give way and kill. &lt;em&gt;...we are all floating&lt;/em&gt; makes more sense to me.

 To my wonder, I have learned since I came back to my computer that the line is from a Christian song titled &quot;How He Loves.&quot; You can read the vacuous, banal lyrics here: http://rickwsmith.com/blog/2010/05/11/if-grace-is-an-ocean-were-all-sinking-the-story-behind-how-he-loves/. I think I might have chosen a better metaphor than death-by-grace had I written the lyrics. But then again, I think. And the song writer obviously does not. I wonder about the cause and effect relationship between general intelligence and belief in the supernatural. And what&#039;s worse than the lyrics is that the websites I have visited that refer to this song promote this as one of the very best Christian songs ever, and the lady who wore the T-shirt is an over-the-top fan. I would say &quot;God help us all,&quot; but that would be pointless, wouldn&#039;t it?&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8068&#039;,&#039;Mr Fnortner&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8068&#039;,&#039;Mr Fnortner&#039;,&#039;I can\&#039;t match Urban\&#039;s articulate statement with anything reasonably profound, so I want to submit the winner of the lifetime achievement award for inanity. This was on a T-shirt I saw on a fat lady at a restaurant today (part of the after-church crowd filling the restaurant): &lt;em&gt;If His grace is an ocean we are all sinking. &lt;\/em&gt;I was stunned by the phenomenally absurd metaphor, then I spent a wasted five minutes trying to imagine what the author really meant, then I gave up in exasperation. In my mind, if I were to be creative with the concept of grace, I would think that grace should support a body rather than give way and kill. &lt;em&gt;...we are all floating&lt;\/em&gt; makes more sense to me.\r\n\r\n To my wonder, I have learned since I came back to my computer that the line is from a Christian song titled \&quot;How He Loves.\&quot; You can read the vacuous, banal lyrics here: http:\/\/rickwsmith.com\/blog\/2010\/05\/11\/if-grace-is-an-ocean-were-all-sinking-the-story-behind-how-he-loves\/. I think I might have chosen a better metaphor than death-by-grace had I written the lyrics. But then again, I think. And the song writer obviously does not. I wonder about the cause and effect relationship between general intelligence and belief in the supernatural. And what\&#039;s worse than the lyrics is that the websites I have visited that refer to this song promote this as one of the very best Christian songs ever, and the lady who wore the T-shirt is an over-the-top fan. I would say \&quot;God help us all,\&quot; but that would be pointless, wouldn\&#039;t it?&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t match Urban&#8217;s articulate statement with anything reasonably profound, so I want to submit the winner of the lifetime achievement award for inanity. This was on a T-shirt I saw on a fat lady at a restaurant today (part of the after-church crowd filling the restaurant): <em>If His grace is an ocean we are all sinking. </em>I was stunned by the phenomenally absurd metaphor, then I spent a wasted five minutes trying to imagine what the author really meant, then I gave up in exasperation. In my mind, if I were to be creative with the concept of grace, I would think that grace should support a body rather than give way and kill. <em>&#8230;we are all floating</em> makes more sense to me.</p>
<p> To my wonder, I have learned since I came back to my computer that the line is from a Christian song titled &#8220;How He Loves.&#8221; You can read the vacuous, banal lyrics here: <a href="http://rickwsmith.com/blog/2010/05/11/if-grace-is-an-ocean-were-all-sinking-the-story-behind-how-he-loves/" rel="nofollow">http://rickwsmith.com/blog/2010/05/11/if-grace-is-an-ocean-were-all-sinking-the-story-behind-how-he-loves/</a>. I think I might have chosen a better metaphor than death-by-grace had I written the lyrics. But then again, I think. And the song writer obviously does not. I wonder about the cause and effect relationship between general intelligence and belief in the supernatural. And what&#8217;s worse than the lyrics is that the websites I have visited that refer to this song promote this as one of the very best Christian songs ever, and the lady who wore the T-shirt is an over-the-top fan. I would say &#8220;God help us all,&#8221; but that would be pointless, wouldn&#8217;t it?
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8068','Mr Fnortner'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8068','Mr Fnortner','I can\'t match Urban\'s articulate statement with anything reasonably profound, so I want to submit the winner of the lifetime achievement award for inanity. This was on a T-shirt I saw on a fat lady at a restaurant today (part of the after-church crowd filling the restaurant): &lt;em&gt;If His grace is an ocean we are all sinking. &lt;\/em&gt;I was stunned by the phenomenally absurd metaphor, then I spent a wasted five minutes trying to imagine what the author really meant, then I gave up in exasperation. In my mind, if I were to be creative with the concept of grace, I would think that grace should support a body rather than give way and kill. &lt;em&gt;...we are all floating&lt;\/em&gt; makes more sense to me.\r\n\r\n To my wonder, I have learned since I came back to my computer that the line is from a Christian song titled \&quot;How He Loves.\&quot; You can read the vacuous, banal lyrics here: http:\/\/rickwsmith.com\/blog\/2010\/05\/11\/if-grace-is-an-ocean-were-all-sinking-the-story-behind-how-he-loves\/. I think I might have chosen a better metaphor than death-by-grace had I written the lyrics. But then again, I think. And the song writer obviously does not. I wonder about the cause and effect relationship between general intelligence and belief in the supernatural. And what\'s worse than the lyrics is that the websites I have visited that refer to this song promote this as one of the very best Christian songs ever, and the lady who wore the T-shirt is an over-the-top fan. I would say \&quot;God help us all,\&quot; but that would be pointless, wouldn\'t it?'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on These are bad signs by urban</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220&#038;cpage=1#comment-8067</link>
		<dc:creator>urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 02:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1220#comment-8067</guid>
		<description>I detect the ghost of John Calvin lurking beneath your church signs.  Calvin may well have been the most incandescently brilliant Protestant theologian of the 16th century, if not indeed of all Protestant Christianity, but he was also one very sick puppy.  Once when someone blanched at his grim view of humanity and asked, &quot;What about infants?&quot;, Calvin replied, &quot;Wriggling snakes!&quot; If you&#039;ve ever wondered what the comic strip &quot;Calvin and Hobbes&quot; had to do with John Calvin and Thomas Hobbes, consider that these men represent two utterly incompatible world views, and yet share a very, very low opinion of their own species, the two great pessimists of the early modern period. Hmmmm....

Sadly, Calvin&#039;s ghost haunts the American landscape in the early 21st century. It&#039;s a rather classic un-quiet grave scenario, I&#039;m afraid.  Will someone, ANYONE, please just dig up the man&#039;s grave and drive a stake through the corpse&#039;s heart, or do whatever sage-burning-incantation-chanting ritual it takes to make him go away. His fifteen minutes were up three hundred and thirty years ago. Parade&#039;s gone by, Old Timer. Move along.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8067&#039;,&#039;urban&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8067&#039;,&#039;urban&#039;,&#039;I detect the ghost of John Calvin lurking beneath your church signs.  Calvin may well have been the most incandescently brilliant Protestant theologian of the 16th century, if not indeed of all Protestant Christianity, but he was also one very sick puppy.  Once when someone blanched at his grim view of humanity and asked, \&quot;What about infants?\&quot;, Calvin replied, \&quot;Wriggling snakes!\&quot; If you\&#039;ve ever wondered what the comic strip \&quot;Calvin and Hobbes\&quot; had to do with John Calvin and Thomas Hobbes, consider that these men represent two utterly incompatible world views, and yet share a very, very low opinion of their own species, the two great pessimists of the early modern period. Hmmmm....\r\n\r\nSadly, Calvin\&#039;s ghost haunts the American landscape in the early 21st century. It\&#039;s a rather classic un-quiet grave scenario, I\&#039;m afraid.  Will someone, ANYONE, please just dig up the man\&#039;s grave and drive a stake through the corpse\&#039;s heart, or do whatever sage-burning-incantation-chanting ritual it takes to make him go away. His fifteen minutes were up three hundred and thirty years ago. Parade\&#039;s gone by, Old Timer. Move along.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I detect the ghost of John Calvin lurking beneath your church signs.  Calvin may well have been the most incandescently brilliant Protestant theologian of the 16th century, if not indeed of all Protestant Christianity, but he was also one very sick puppy.  Once when someone blanched at his grim view of humanity and asked, &#8220;What about infants?&#8221;, Calvin replied, &#8220;Wriggling snakes!&#8221; If you&#8217;ve ever wondered what the comic strip &#8220;Calvin and Hobbes&#8221; had to do with John Calvin and Thomas Hobbes, consider that these men represent two utterly incompatible world views, and yet share a very, very low opinion of their own species, the two great pessimists of the early modern period. Hmmmm&#8230;.</p>
<p>Sadly, Calvin&#8217;s ghost haunts the American landscape in the early 21st century. It&#8217;s a rather classic un-quiet grave scenario, I&#8217;m afraid.  Will someone, ANYONE, please just dig up the man&#8217;s grave and drive a stake through the corpse&#8217;s heart, or do whatever sage-burning-incantation-chanting ritual it takes to make him go away. His fifteen minutes were up three hundred and thirty years ago. Parade&#8217;s gone by, Old Timer. Move along.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8067','urban'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8067','urban','I detect the ghost of John Calvin lurking beneath your church signs.  Calvin may well have been the most incandescently brilliant Protestant theologian of the 16th century, if not indeed of all Protestant Christianity, but he was also one very sick puppy.  Once when someone blanched at his grim view of humanity and asked, \&quot;What about infants?\&quot;, Calvin replied, \&quot;Wriggling snakes!\&quot; If you\'ve ever wondered what the comic strip \&quot;Calvin and Hobbes\&quot; had to do with John Calvin and Thomas Hobbes, consider that these men represent two utterly incompatible world views, and yet share a very, very low opinion of their own species, the two great pessimists of the early modern period. Hmmmm....\r\n\r\nSadly, Calvin\'s ghost haunts the American landscape in the early 21st century. It\'s a rather classic un-quiet grave scenario, I\'m afraid.  Will someone, ANYONE, please just dig up the man\'s grave and drive a stake through the corpse\'s heart, or do whatever sage-burning-incantation-chanting ritual it takes to make him go away. His fifteen minutes were up three hundred and thirty years ago. Parade\'s gone by, Old Timer. Move along.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu: Install Amarok 1.4 in 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) by dwasifar</title>
		<link>http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1111&#038;cpage=1#comment-8039</link>
		<dc:creator>dwasifar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=1111#comment-8039</guid>
		<description>Did you try disabling the amarok14 repos, reinstalling Amarok 2.x from the official repos, and starting over?&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;8039&#039;,&#039;dwasifar&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;8039&#039;,&#039;dwasifar&#039;,&#039;Did you try disabling the amarok14 repos, reinstalling Amarok 2.x from the official repos, and starting over?&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you try disabling the amarok14 repos, reinstalling Amarok 2.x from the official repos, and starting over?
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8039','dwasifar'); return false;">Reply</a>  | <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8039','dwasifar','Did you try disabling the amarok14 repos, reinstalling Amarok 2.x from the official repos, and starting over?'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
